Friday, August 11, 2006

Coke, Pepsi and public relations

Brian Bremner and Nandini Lakshman write in BusinessWeek:

Welcome to the India instalment of the fabled cola wars. But this time around, global soft-drink heavies Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are actually on the same side. Their adversaries: a feisty New Delhi-based environmental group, left-leaning politicians in Southern India, and non-stop press coverage that has raised angst levels over pesticide traces discovered in these companies' carbonated drinks. On Aug. 9, the dispute escalated when India's southwestern state of Kerala, home to about 30 million people, banned the Indian subsidiaries of both companies from making or selling their beverages…

In short, this is shaping up to be a public relations calamity of the first order. True, this is a $2 billion market that both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo dominate with a combined share of roughly 80%-plus. Still, "as multinationals, the scrutiny is going to be a little higher, and the public is going to make a judgment," says Madan Bahal, managing director of Adfactors Public Relations, a Mumbai-based firm that represents international companies such as IBM India, Barclays Bank and ABN Amro Banking Group. "And if the judgment is that there is something fishy going on, it will harm you."

This probably won't be an easy judgment to make for most Indian consumers, given the complex technical issues involved. What touched off the controversy was allegations made by the New Delhi Center for Science and Environment (CSE) that pesticide residues found in Coca-Cola and PepsiCo brands were 24 times higher than new safety standards on soft drinks that have been developed by the Bureau of Indian Standards. (These new rules on soft-drink pesticide levels haven't taken effect yet.)

PepsiCo and Coca-Cola have attacked the CSE's findings in advertorials published in Indian newspapers…

Both companies insist their beverage products present no health threats. "Our products are safe and we measure that against the most stringent standards, the European ones," says Coca-Cola Asia spokesman Kenth Kaerhoeg, who is based in Hong Kong…

Prema Sagar, founder and principal of public relations firm Genesis Burson-Marsteller, which represents PepsiCo, also questions the accuracy of CSE's data, given the work was done by its own labs without any outside peer review. "It is not valid," says Sagar. (Coca-Cola has also questioned the integrity of CSE's testing methods.)

She says that both PepsiCo's and Coca-Cola's economic contributions to India and environmental work done there aren't getting the attention they deserve in this dispute. Given the big corporate names involved, the scrutiny has been extremely intense in India. "Big American global brands are going to attract attention," she says. "The attack on the colas right now grabs space" in the media.

That's certainly true, but other public relations pros such as Adfactor's Bahal think both companies might be inviting trouble by primarily going into attack mode on CSE and merely making general assurances that their products are safe. A better approach, Bahal says, would be a more "substantive response" on precisely what levels of pesticides are in their drinks, why that isn't a health threat, and exactly what both companies do to keep it that way.

Admittedly that's tough advice when it basically involves mentioning a pesticide like Lindane, a known carcinogen, or a neurotoxin such as Chlorpyrifos in the same breath as your franchise product. Still, Bahal points out the contrasting approach that Cadbury India took three years ago when live worms started showing up in the company's chocolate products in Mumbai. When Indian government lab reports confirmed the problem, the company quickly investigated and overhauled its packaging procedures to calm consumer fears. That quick action and candor, plus recruiting Bollywood legend Amitabh Bachchan as a new pitchman, quickly restored the brand image. "They were specific on all counts," says Bahal.

Right now, though, the cola tussle in India is being driven more by primal emotion directed at big foreign companies and public fear. PepsiCo pitchman and Bollywood actor and heartthrob Shah Rukh Khan, who says if Pepsi is banned in India he will go overseas to swill the stuff, suggested a more sensible approach would be for everyone to calm down and wait until the government weighs in on the matter. Yet, given the rancor unleashed by this controversy, it may be a while before cooler heads prevail.

6 Comments:

|
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The statement on the fall in investment, by US authorities, I think will take care of the pesticide controversy. That's the best strategy- to get another party speak for you.

22:37  
|
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your suggestion is rational. However, This is not the first time the colas are in problem, this is the second time. The first time when story brokeout in CSE, colas believed that "Public Memory is short". Now a strong reaction from Government helped the consumer to demand better accountability.

23:00  
|
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The “peacetime” benefits of this surrogate brand in foreign markets make it all the more volatile in corporate crisis. It is not just Coca-Cola or Pepsi; it is the personification of America.

found the above in an interesting article on this story:
http://www.levick.com/resources/topics/articles/passage_india.php

14:19  
|
Anonymous Anonymous said...

An interesting discussion is worth comment. I do think
that you should publish more about this topic, it might not be a taboo matter but usually people do not talk about such topics.
To the next! Many thanks!!

Visit my blog post; cuttlebone

23:27  
|
Blogger Mai said...

خدمات تلال
افضل شركة تعقيم فلل وقصور بالبخار في العين
افضل شركة تعقيم منازل بالبخار في العين

12:16  
|
Blogger menna said...

شركات تعقيم المنازل من كورونا أبوظبي
شركات تعقيم المنازل من كورونا دبي

13:52  

Post a Comment

<< Home